1923 Grocery Prices

1933Aug14WashTo get an idea of grocery prices in the United States in 1923, this ad appeared in the Washington Times on August 14, 1923. Everything looks cheap, but there’s been a lot of inflation in the last 99 years. According to this online inflation calculator, one dollar in 1923 was the equivalent of $17.33 in 2022 money, so to compare, you need to multiply these prices by that amount.

For example, five pounds of flour was 27 cents, but that’s the same as $4.68 today. How does that compare to today’s actual price, shown below?

Similarly, a pound of butter was 52 cents, but that’s over $9 in today’s money. And 10 pounds of sugar was 83 cents, the same as $14.39 today. How does that compare to the current prices shown below?

A can of Campbell’s Tomato Soup was 9 cents, but that’s the same as $1.56 today. How does that compare?



Some links on this site are affiliate links, meaning that this site earns a small commission if you make a purchase after using the link.

Get Eclipse Glasses for the 2024 Eclipse!

Templetone Radio Mfg. Co., 1947

1947AugRadioNewsShown here, 75 years ago, is the assembly line of Templetone Radio Mfg. Corporation. The picture appeared on the cover of Radio News, August 1947, which noted that postwar radio sales were at an all-time high, and that this assembly line was typical of the activity of radio plants throughout the country.

The factory was located at 100 Garfield Avenue, New London, CT. The building still stands, and is shown below. It was built in 1920 and originally known as the Edward Bloom Silk Mill.
The building, judging from the Google street view below, appears vacant, but is apparently in the process of being converted to housing.

templetone



1962 British 2 Tube Shortwave Regen

1962AugPracWir2Sixty years ago this month, the August 1962 issue of the British Practical Wireless carried the plans for this handsome set, dubbed the “Atlantic S.W. Two” The two-tube regenerative set was designed for 15-40 meters, but with plug-in coils, the range could be extended. It was said to give good performance and was easy to construct. Also shown was an AC power supply, with transformer, which kept the headphones isolated from the high voltages, and rendered the set safe.

1962AugPracWir



1947 FM Radio Kit

1947AugRadioCraft3Seventy-five years ago, if you wanted to be the first on your block with a receiver for the new postwar FM band, you couldn’t go wrong with the Model FM-7 receiver kit from the Radio Kits Company, 120 Cedar Street, New York.

The set was complete with speaker, but there was also provision to use the set as a tuner to feed a separate hi-fi amplifier. The RF section was pretuned at the factory.

This ad appeared in the August 1947 issue of Radio Craft.  You can find a schematic of the set at this link.

And if you want to put together your own FM radio today (and practice your soldering skills at the same time), you can’t go wrong with the Elenco kit shown here.

And if Junior wants in on the fun, then the Snap Circuits FM receiver shown below can be put together by kids of any age. The manufacturer recommends it for kids over 8 years old, but as long as Junior knows not to eat the parts, it should be fine.



Some links on this site are affiliate links, meaning that this site earns a small commission if you make a purchase after using the link.

Get Eclipse Glasses for the 2024 Eclipse!

Radio Invades Hicksville: 1922

1922AugRadioNewsStarting about a hundred years ago, radio was becoming very much a rural phenomenon, as shown by this cover illustration from the August 1922 issue of Radio News.

For an interesting scholarly look at radio’s impact on rural America, see the article “Radio in the 1920s: A Social Force in South Dakota,” by Reynold M. Wik, South Dakota History, Vol. 11, p. 94 (1981).



Some links on this site are affiliate links, meaning that this site earns a small commission if you make a purchase after clicking on the link.

1962 One Tube 6 Meter Transceiver

1962AugPEThis handsome one-tube six-meter transceiver made its debut 60 years ago this month, in the August 1962 issue of Popular Electronics.  The set was put together by author Michael Robbins, K6OAH, who reported that from his Los Angeles location, during a band opening, the set was able to pull in signals from the Mexican to the Canadian border. The transmitter put out a respectable 2 watts.

The secret of the design was the 6EZ8 triple triode. On receive, it allowed one stage of RF amplification before the superregenerative receiver, which probably meant that the receiver didn’t radiate an annoying signal. The set ran on AC power, although it included two flashlight batteries to power the carbon microphone.

1962AugPE2



Combination Handwashing Sink/Toilet Tank

Sinktwice

A basically good idea for some situations, but with some serious limitations

More than once, I’ve seen a meme extolling the virtues of a product similar to the one shown here. The accompanying text is usually along the lines of:

In Japan, a sink is built above the toilet tank for hand washing. The water drains into the toilet tank to be used for the next flush, and saves millions of gallons of water each year.

This is usually followed by many gushing comments stating what a great idea it is.  Along the way, it usually turns into a discussion of how stubborn Americans refuse to adopt this idea, or that a conspiracy by the Big Toilet Companies has suppressed the idea. Invariably, when I point out the disadvantages, everyone wants to argue with me, although nobody actually wants to buy one, even though they are readily available.

It’s actually not a bad idea, and there are certain niche applications where it could really come in handy. For example, if you wanted to install a toilet in a room that simply did not have room for a sink, it would be a good choice.

The people who take a strong position about what a good idea this is often don’t seem to understand exactly how it works, and their comments often reflect their confusion. When you flush a toilet, the water to flush is expelled from the tank, and runs through various pathways in the porcelain and into the bowl. Simultaneously, the tank starts refilling with water for the next flush. This product runs that refill water through a faucet on top, through a drain, and into the tank. So in the minute or so that the tank needs to refill, the little faucet on top of the toilet is running. It uses the same amount of water as any other flush. But since it’s now running outside the tank, if you want, you can wash your hands with it. Again, this is an excellent idea, and probably has some niche applications.

But there are a few problems, and depending on your solution to these problems, you might cause more environmental problems of the type you were hoping to solve.

First of all, in most parts of the country (other than areas with very high humidity), you flush the toilet with cold water. But most people wash their hands with hot water. There are two solutions to this problem. Interestingly, one viable solution is to simply resign yourself to the use of cold water. The CDC in its wisdom, for example, provides handwashing instructions calling on you to “wet your hands with clean, running water (warm or cold)” before applying soap.

However, most Americans probably prefer the familiar warm water when washing hands. So the other alternative is to connect the toilet to the warm water, instead of the cold. But this means that every time the toilet gets flushed, you are heating up 2.5 gallons of water, whether or not you wash your hands. And even if you wash your hands every single time, you use much less than 2.5 gallons in the process. So the net effect is that by making this change, you are unnecessarily heating up a lot of water, which you will literally flush down the toilet. That doesn’t sound like a very “green” thing to do.

Another potential problem is buildup of dirt or soap scum in the rim jets of the toilet. When you flush the toilet, water goes through various pathways in the porcelain, and into the bowl. Some of these, particularly the rim jets at the top of the bowl, are rather small. They are designed to have clean water run through them, and it seems to me that if you run grey water through them, there’s a potential for them to get clogged up.  (And of course, if anything else ever gets poured down the drain, it runs the risk of clogging those little openings.)

It is possible to clean the jets, at least to some extent, by getting down on your hands and knees in front of the bowl, and reaching in with a small brush. But since most of the water’s path is buried in the porcelain, it seems to me that there’s a potential for clogging in an inaccessible area. Of course, you can probably clean them by pouring in toxic chemicals, but if the whole point of this exercise was to “go green,” that doesn’t seem like a good alternative. And if you have to eventually replace the toilet, sending the old one off to the landfill doesn’t sound like a particularly environmentally sound thing to do.

Another issue is washing your hands other than after using the toilet. The only way to get the water to flow is by flushing the toilet. So whenever you want to wash your hands for any reason, you must either find another sink, or else send 2.5 gallons of water literally down the drain. Also, if you are in the middle of washing your hands, but you didn’t quite finish rinsing, you have no choice but to send another 2.5 gallons of perfectly good water into the septic system.

The final issue is that the tank isn’t located very conveniently for washing your hands.

Despite these issues, this is actually a rather good idea, as long as you understand these limitations. If you can live with these downsides, you’ll be glad to know that the Big Toilet Companies are not suppressing this invention. Indeed, like anything else, you can get them at Amazon.

There are a few different brands.  Some are plastic, and some are ceramic.  And more importantly, they come in different sizes, so find the one that fits your tank.  You can find them at this Amazon search result.

 



Some links on this site are affiliate links, meaning that this site earns a small commission if you make a purchase after clicking the link.

1922 Radio-Phono Combo

1922AugPMShown here from a hundred years ago is one of the first examples of a radio-phonograph combination. According to the August 1922 issue of Popular Mechanics, the set was a one-control radio receiver with a super-amplifier (using three tubes to accomplish what had previously required five) mounted in the cabinet of a console phonograph. The radio was connected to the phonograph’s horn, and no ground or antenna connection was required, thanks to a special loop antenna.

With a single control, the owner simply tuned the set to the correct wavelength.



1952 “Salesman’s Pal” Broadcast Superhet

1952AugPM11952AugPM2Seventy years ago this month, the August 1952 issue of Popular Mechanics showed how to build this extremely compact broadcast receiver. The set was named “The Salesman’s Pal,” as it was designed to meet the needs of the “honest-to-goodness salesman–on the road most of the time,” although it was also suitable for the once-a-year vacationer.

The set was a typical “All-American-Five” AC-DC set, but was small enough to conveniently slip inside a briefcase. Two recently available parts made the small size possible. The first was a Centralab Audet PC-150 printed circuit unit, which we might today call a predecessor of the integrated circuit, as it contained several resistors and capacitors in the same package. The other, which became ubiquitous in later portable radios, was the “Ferri-Loopstick,” a ferrite core antenna coil.

The article pointed out that while the set was not difficult to build, the limited space meant that it was not intended for beginners.

1952AugPM3



NOAA Weather Radio for the Deaf

Recently, on a state park Facebook group, there was a discussion of NOAA weather radios. Many people use their cell phones to receive weather warnings. But if you’re camped at a state park, it’s quite possible that you don’t have any internet or cellular service. So a weather radio is an important item to pack.  Unlike internet or cellular signals, the NOAA weather radio blankets the nation (as well as the corresponding services in Canada and Mexico).  Unless you live in an extremely remote part of the country, you will be able to pick up a weather radio signal.  To view a coverage map for your state, follow this link.)  These stations broadcast weather information constantly, and during severe weather, they transmit an alert that will activate an alarm in receivers.  For more information, you can view our earlier post.

One deaf person was part of the conversation, and he pointed out (incorrectly) that a radio wouldn’t do him much good. I corrected him, because a NOAA weather radio is very useful, even for someone who cannot hear, because weather warnings are available other than by audible means. If you have internet access, you will probably get more complete information from an internet source. But in areas with no internet access, or just as important, if the internet goes down because of the storm, then your phone won’t do you any good. In these situations, having a weather radio can be a lifesaver, and this is also true for deaf persons.

The voice on a weather radio gives more information, but during severe weather, the radio will tell you, by text display, that there is a warning, such as a tornado warning, for your county. While the additional audio information is nice, it’s not really necessary. If you know that there is a tornado warning for your county, then you know to take shelter.

Even if you do have internet access, having a weather radio is still a good idea, because it will alert you to watches and warnings, and upon seeing a warning, you can check the internet for specific details.

For a deaf person, you really need a weather radio with SAME encoding. This type of radio is programmable for your particular county, and an alarm will sound if there is a warning for your county. The text display will indicate what kind of warning it is, such as TORNADO, SEVERE THUNDERSTORM, FLASH FLOOD, etc. Most weather radios have an audible alarm that sounds during a warning. A deaf person will need one with a visual indication, such as a strobe light.

While other radios might have these same features, the Midland model WR120B/WR120EZ has these features (with the additional external strobe light).  For a deaf person to be alerted, you will also need to buy a strobe light and/or pillow shaker.

The weather radio includes an AC adapter, but it’s a good idea to keep batteries in the radio at all times, since power often goes out during bad weather. You will need 3 AA batteries for the radio, and the strobe light and pillow shaker each require two AA batteries.

The radio, the strobe, the pillow shaker, and the batteries, are all available at Amazon:

If you want to use both the strobe and the pillow shaker, you will also need an adapter cable such as the one shown below, so that you can plug both of them into the radio. (You do not need a stereo cable, but this stereo cable will work.)

If you are planning on using both, you can buy the strobe, the pillow shaker, and the adapter cable as one package deal:

You can read more information from NOAA about weather radios and the deaf at this link.

The video below, from NOAA, explains in American Sign Language how to program the WR120EZ weather radio.



Some links on this site are affiliate links, meaning that this site earns a small commission if you make a purchase after clicking the link.