Category Archives: Photography history

1939: The Camera as a Sales Tool

Eighty-five years ago, radio repairman Lewis P. Evans of Chicago’s Evans Radio Laboratory brought along a camera on every service call. He would snap a picture of the house, or if he was lucky, a picture of a child, or even the family dog.

He would hold on to the pictures for a few months, and then send them to the woman of the house, with the shop’s address on the back. He reported that a woman can’t resist a picture of her own home or someone in her family. The picture would be saved, or perhaps placed in the family photo album. And when the radio needed service, they would know exactly where to find the shop’s address.

This feature appeared in the February 1939 issue of Radio Retailing. According to this 1936 newspaper advertisement, the shop’s address (presumably the one on the backs of the photos) was 7152 S. Exchange Ave.



Give Your Boy Scout a Brownie, 1924

Screenshot 2024-02-12 12.56.33 PMIf you were in the market for a gift for your Boy Scout a hundred years ago to celebrate the anniversary of the BSA, you couldn’t go wrong by getting him a Brownie camera from the Eastman Kodak Company. And if you were in Omaha, the place to get it would be the Kodak counter of the Robert Dempster Co., 1813 Farnam Street, as seen in this ad from the February 13, 1924, issue of the Omaha Bee.



Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas from OneTubeRadio.com!

We present a hundred year old silent film, the 1923 version of A Christmas Carol starring Russell Thorndike as Scrooge. It’s a short feature, so the story is quite condensed into less than a half hour. This rendition is accompanied by recordings from that era. Thorndike is best known as an author, and you can find his author page at Amazon.



Some links on this site are affiliate links, meaning that this site earns a small commission if you make a purchase after following the link..

1923 Photo Finish

1923NovSciInv2The concept of a “photo finish” has been around for a century, as shown by this Illustration in the November, 1923, issue of Science and Invention.

This setup was in place at the Maisons-Laffitte Racecourse near Paris. The horses crossing the finish line broke a thread, which would trip the shutter of the cameras above. The photos would be ready in four minutes to decide a close race.



Movies on your Phonograph: 1923

1923NovSciInvThis illustration from the November 1923 issue of Science and Invention fits squarely into the category of very interesting things that never caught on for want of a practical application.

It is a system for showing motion pictures from your phonograph. The phonograph is busy spinning at 78 RPM, and this system allows you to use that phenomenon to project movies. The frames of your movie are printed on the edge of a paper disk which is placed on the platter, just like a phonograph record. Two bright lights shine on the image, and the opaque image is projected through a prism onto the screen.

A single disk will give you a movie of about 1/78 of a minute long. To provide for longer movies, the disk bends up automatically as it passes under the prism, which allows the layer below to be shown.

The magazine refers to it only as the “Jenkins movie machine.” That is probably a reference to Charles Francis Jenkins (1867-1934), a pioneer of early cinema. He went on to television, as the principal of W3XK, the first television station in the United States, which began broadcasts to the general public in 1928.



Happy Halloween!

1923Oct31OmahaBeeOn Halloween a hundred years ago, if you were in Omaha, you could use the occasion to buy a phonograph for your family at the Burgess-Nash Company.  While you were there, you could get your Halloween dinner for 65 cents.  Or, if you were on a budget, you could get a lunch of chicken a la king in the mezzanine for 35 cents.

The ad appeared in the Omaha Bee, October 31, 1923.



Uncle Fester: The Early Years

Screenshot 2023-03-07 11.53.17 AMShown here, a hundred years ago today, in the Washington Evening Star, March 9, 1923, is film star Jackie Coogan, talking from WGY radio in Schenectady, NY.  The device shown is the pallophotophone, used for recording sound on film.

Jackie Coogan as Uncle Fester (The Addams Family, 1966).jpg

Uncle Fester. Wikipedia image.

If the actor’s name rings a bell, it’s because he went on to play Uncle Fester in the Addams Family.  Perhaps his trademark image with the lightbulb in his mouth was inspired by the pallophotophone.



Dan Gibson Parabolic Microphone

1072MarPMShown here is Canadian wildlife photographer Dan Gibson using the parabolic microphone he developed. Here, he has the mike mounted on the prow of his canoe, which allows him to silently paddle up in search of wildlife.

This photo is from the March 1972 issue of Popular Mechanics, in which he is described as a photographer who developed the tool primarily to capture photographs of wildlife. The article hinted, however, that the system could be used to capture wildlife sounds on tape. Thanks to this microphone, Gibson became more famous as a recording artist, with his Solitudes series of recordings of nature sounds and music. Here, for example, is his recording of La Mer (Beyond the Sea):

You can find the label’s recordings on Amazon, or find more information at their facebook page. If you’re looking for a parabolic microphone, here are some of the current offerings:



Some links on this site are affiliate links, meaning that this site earns a small commission if you make a purchase after clicking the link.

Fotomat: 1971

1971Jul16LifeFifty years ago today, the July 16 1971 issue of Life magazine carried this ad showing one of the most iconic structures of the 1970s, namely, the Fotomat.  According to the ad, there were 1000 such structures in parking lots coast to coast.

The first one appeared in California in 1965, the company went public in 1971, was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 1977, and peaked at over 4000 Fotomats in about 1980.

For our readers who are too young to remember, there was a time when photography required a commodity called “film” that went inside the camera. When the film was exposed to light, a latent image would form on the film. When the film was used up, it had to be removed from the camera in complete darkness, and taken somewhere to be “developed”. This process would turn the film into a “negative,” with a visible image but with the colors reversed. The negative would then essentially be photographed a second time, and turned into a “print.”

A whole industry developed around this process. Stores sold film, and many of them allowed you to drop off the film to be developed. Typically, the film was sent by the store to a distant laboratory, and you came back a few days later to pick up your prints. It wasn’t until the end of this agonizing wait that you found out whether your pictures turned out OK.  You typically paid for the developing when you picked up the pictures.  They would charge you to develop the roll of film, but if some of the pictures were hopeless, they wouldn’t bother making prints of those, and you would only have to pay for the ones that they printed.

There were two solutions to this agonizing delay. The first was the development of the Polaroid camera, sometimes called the Land camera in honor of its inventor, Edwin Land.  (As a youngster, I mistakenly assumed that Land cameras were for use on land, and other instant cameras were better suited for use on the water.)  These cameras, through a seemingly magical process, allowed you to get the finished picture after a wait of only a minute or two.  We previously featured one of their early models.  The Polaroid cameras and their film were, however, expensive, and the image quality was not as good as even an inexpensive traditional camera.

American business, therefore, came to the rescue, and speeded up the developing process as much as possible. The film still needed to be sent to a large lab for developing, but Fotomat was a pioneer in expediting this process as much as possible: You dropped off the film at their little building in the parking lot, without having to get out of your car. The film was sent to their lab the same day, developed overnight, and you could pick it up the very next day, again, without having to get out of your car. You could also buy film from them, as well as other photographic accessories such as flash cubes, and even low-end cameras.

The first existential threat to Fotomat came in the 1980s with the introduction of the minilab.  A minilab was a self-contained photo processing system that was small enough to put inside a retail store. No longer was it necessary to send film to a distant lab. The whole process could be done right in the store by someone with only minimal training, and it could be done while the customer waited. Fotomat allowed you to do the whole transaction without getting out of your car, but you still had to come back the next day. With the minilab, you would have to walk into the store, but you could get your pictures minutes later. Even though Fotomat “put girls in our stores who really enjoy smiling,” the chain could not compete with the faster service now offered inside a traditional store.

Of course, the final death blow to Fotomat was the digital camera, which no longer requires film or developing.

Since there were thousands of these Fotomats in supermarket parking lots around the country, many are still standing. Many of them were converted to drive-through coffee shops, although other businesses have adopted these small structures. You can see many examples at this Flickr group.  You can probably see examples right in your neighborhood. Look in the parking lot of your closest strip mall, and you’ll probably find one.



1943 Opaque Projector

1943SepPSDuring my school days in the 1960s and 1970s, the teacher would occasionally wheel out a monstrosity known as the opaque projector. It would project the image of an opaque object, such as the page of a book, onto a screen. Apparently, the models of that era had about a 1000 watt lamp inside, and their size was due in part to the fact that they required a big fan to keep it cool. The process also required a lens that was quite large.

The projector was rarely used. Instead, it was much more common to copy the desired image onto a transparency, which was projected with the much more common overhead projector.

75 years ago this month, the September 1943 issue of Popular Science showed how to make an opaque projector. The article doesn’t seem to specify the wattage of the bulbs, but since ordinary household bulbs are shown, I assume that they would be 100 watts. The lens is made from one, or preferably two, magnifying glasses mounted in a tube.

The opaque projector has been more or less replaced by the document camera, such as the one shown here on Amazon, which can be viewed through the video projector that is now found in almost all American classrooms.

1943SepPS2