Category Archives: Radio

1940 Two Tube Shortwave Receiver

1940PS2tubeThis cute little two-tube broadcast/short wave receiver appeared in Popular Science 75 years ago this month in the June 1940 issue.

1940PlugInCoilsIt used  ready-made coils which plugged into the top of the set to change bands. Back in the day, you could buy the coils pre-wound, such as the ones shown here in the 1940 Allied catalog. A set of four coils covering 17-270 meters would cost $1.80. If you wanted to get the bottom of the broadcast band, the coil covering 250-650 meters would be an additional 75 cents.  Plug-in coils are unobtanium these days, but AA8V has a good description of how to make your own forms from a defunct tube and section of PVC.

A 1N5 tube was used as the regenerative detector, with a 1A5 serving as an audio amplifier to drive a built-in speaker. It was powered by a 1.5 volt battery for the filaments, with a 90 volt B battery, also tapped at 22.5 volts.

The builder of this set probably heard a lot of interesting signals on the shortwave bands during the war.

The 1N5 and 1A5 tubes are available at Antique Electronic Supply.  All other parts are readily obtainable, other than the plug-in coils, which you can wind yourself. For ideas on where to find parts, visit my crystal set parts page or my how to stock your junk box page.

1940PS2tubeSchematic

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon



Two 1945 Crystal Sets

1945PMXtalSet1Seventy years ago this month, the June 1945 issue of Popular Mechanics carried the plans for the two crystal sets shown here. As the article points out, crystal sets can come in two varieties. The simplest set has little selectivity, and is suitable only for tuning in the one strongest station in a given area. For more variety, a more complex set with more selectivity is required. The magazine showed two sets, one in each category.

The simple set had its coil and all of the other parts mounted on a plastic drinking cup. The more selective set contained two variable condensers, both salvaged from old broadcast radios. Complete crystal detectors could be purchased for about 25 cents, or the builder could make one with a piece of galena. Thus, even with wartime parts shortages, most hobbyists would be able to scavenge together the needed parts.1945PMXtalSet2

For those wishing to replicate one of these designs today, I have ideas for finding parts on my crystal set parts page.

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon





FCC Reduces GMRS License Fee: Implications for Emergency Communications

2018 Update: This page was written in 2015, after the FCC reduced the fee for the GMRS license. GMRS remains a good option for many emergency communications applications.

You can obtain a GMRS license by mail or online. As with many bureaucratic activities, it’s somewhat more complicated than necessary, but not particularly difficult. The fee for the ten year license is currently $70. Just follow these steps:

Applying for the License Online:


You can read the full instructions at this page on the FCC website.  It’s basically a two-step process.  First, you will need to set up an account on the FCC Universal Licensing System (ULS).  When you do, you will receive an “FRN” (FCC Registration Number) and password.  If you have future business with the FCC, you’ll use this same account.  You will sign up at this page on the FCC website.

After you have the ULS Account set up, you will go to this page on the FCC website to start the application.  All of the questions on the application should be self-explanatory.

Applying for the License By Mail:

To apply by mail, you will actually need to send three separate forms from the FCC website:

Download form 605 first, since it contains most of the general instructions.  For more information, the full instructions can be found on page 9 of this FCC document.


On May 20, 2015, the FCC announced that it reduced the license fee for GMRS radio licenses.

This change has a significant implication for those looking for an inexpensive method of family communication, especially for emergency preparedness. The change allows hams and others to potentially provide an important service to their neighbors, at a very low cost.  To see how it’s important, we need to look at the history of GMRS radio, and the related FRS radio service.

FRS Radio

Inexpensive FRS radios.

In 1996, the FCC created the Family Radio Service (FRS), which allowed unlicensed use of UHF radios on 14 channels. millions of such radios were sold, and even the most inexpensive versions (often under ten dollars) provide quite reliable communications over short distances (less than a mile).

The FCC imposed a number of technical requirements for these radios. First of all, the maximum power allowed was 500 milliwatts (1/2 watt). In most cases, this low power is not a significant limitation. The most important limitation, however, was that the antenna had to be permanently mounted to the radio, with no method of connecting an external antenna.

This is a very significant limitation because on the UHF frequencies used by these radios, the main factor in determining distance is the height of the antenna. This is because UHF radio waves behave almost the same as light waves: they travel in a line of sight. Radio waves have some ability to penetrate obstructions, but this is very limited. Therefore, an FRS radio really has about the same range as a flashlight. If you can’t see the other radio, then you probably won’t be able to communicate with it. (Again, the radio waves can penetrate some obstructions, but this ability is very limited.)

If you have a flashlight in your hand, then you can’t be seen very far away, because the light beam will hit obstructions. And an FRS radio works under the same principle: Your signal won’t get out very far because it will hit obstructions. On the other hand, if you climbed a mountain with the flashlight, then it could be seen for many miles, because you would be up clear of the obstructions. And an FRS radio would work the same way. If you were on top of a mountain, then you would be able to communicate many miles, as long as the person at the other end was able to see the mountain off in the distance.

It’s usually not practical to climb a mountain to extend the range of your radio. However, it’s not the location of the radio that is important. The critical factor is the location of the antenna. There’s a reason why radio and TV stations spend money building expensive towers, and that reason is to increase the height of their antenna.

But this is not possible with FRS radios, because they are not allowed to have external antennas or any way to connect an external antenna. Therefore, their range was extremely limited.

One manufacturer cleverly exploited a  loophole to market an FRS radio with the functional equivalent of an external antenna. Radio Shack sold an FRS radio with an external microphone. The radio itself was sealed inside a unit that mounted to the top of a vehicle with a strong magnet. The antenna was permanently attached to the radio, so it met the FCC rules. But all of the controls were mounted on the microphone, which could be used inside the car. Having the antenna (and radio) on top of the car significantly extended the range of the unit.

GMRS

The General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) dates back to the 1960’s. Initially, the equipment was very expensive, but it provided a very versatile method of communications. The rules allowed up to 50 watts, and external antennas were the norm. GMRS could provide reliable communication over many miles. Depending on local conditions (in particular, antenna height), a range of 20-50 miles would be quite common. But the equipment was rather expensive, and GMRS was never adopted to its full potential. Fifteen channels are assigned to GMRS. A license is required, and the license carried a fee. Given the versatility of GMRS, this was actually quite a bargain, especially considering that the equipment would cost hundreds of dollars.

When FRS radio was created in 1996, the situation soon changed. Seven of the fourteen FRS channels were shared with GMRS. In other words, an FRS user could talk to GMRS radios on channels 1-7. But there were relatively few GMRS users, and this option was rarely utilized. While they were compatible, the two services served different needs. GMRS used expensive equipment to communicate over fairly long distances. Most of the millions of FRS radios that were sold were used for very short-range communication, or even as children’s toys. While having the shared channels was probably a good idea, I don’t think the FCC anticipated how popular FRS radio would become, or how inexpensive the radios would be. The net effect was that the seven shared channels became cluttered with FRS users, and were generally avoided by GMRS users.

Some manufacturers, however, started marketing around the new possibilities. They started selling 15-channel portable GMRS radios, and the prices kept coming down. These units had the best of both worlds: They could use higher power than the FRS radios, but they could still communicate with the cheaper radios on 7 channels. And most importantly, they had provision for an external antenna. Therefore, they had the greater potential range of a GMRS radio.

When prices of such radios got less expensive, many users (probably most) started ignoring the licensing requirement. This is understandable, since from their point of view, they had in their hands a slightly better FRS radio, which probably cost less than $90. It made little sense to pay an additional $90 for a license, especially if they used only channels 1-7. While a license was technically required on these channels, it would be essentially impossible to tell whether the user was using a license-free FRS radio or a GMRS radio for which a license was required.

Meanwhile, the price of these radios kept getting lower and lower, and manufacturers had to come up with a marketing angle. They started by printing on the package the range of the radio in miles. Remember, the range of the radio is limited by the location of the antenna. If you are standing in a valley, the range will probably be less than a mile. If you’re standing on top of Mount McKinley, then the range will be hundreds of miles. And in general, the quality of the radio has very little to do with it. So the manufacturers started inflating the range estimates for their radios. These claims were not false–they were merely misleading.  After all, if you climbed Mount McKinley with the radio, you would easily get the advertised range.

So one manufacturer would be selling a radio with a “one mile” range, which would probably be a reasonable estimate in normal use. But another manufacturer could take a nearly identical radio to a small hill and truthfully state that it had a two-mile range. Another manufacturer could take his identical radio to a slightly larger hill and truthfully claim a range of three miles. The products didn’t need to improve–the manufacturer just needed to find a bigger hill.

Chances are, the “30 mile” radio wasn’t any better than the “2 mile” radio right next to it on the shelf. But understandably, consumers were more likely to buy the “30 mile” radio.

Soon, distance claims were strained to the point of incredulity, and the marketing people needed to come up with a different angle. Some manufacturers were selling 14-channel FRS radios. Some manufacturers were selling 15-channel GMRS radios. There were really only two differences. First of all, the 15-channel GMRS radios required a license, but this requirement was routinely ignored. The only real advantage that the 15-channel GMRS radios had was that they could be used with an external antenna, the one thing that would really increase their range. But most people used these radios only as portable walkie-talkies, and most people didn’t realize that they could get significant range by use of an outdoor antenna. So the ability to use an external antenna was never a selling point.

At some point, some manufacturer realized that they could distinguish their product by selling a 22-channel radio. The radio would be a combined FRS-GMRS radio that could use the 7 shared GMRS-FRS channels, the 7 FRS-only channels, and the 8 GMRS-only channels. This was legal, as long as the radio met the requirements for both services. They had to use the lower power on the FRS-only channels. (And I suspect that most of them simply used the lower power on all channels.) But more importantly, the combined unit had to have a permanent antenna, with no possibility of hooking up an outside antenna. In other words, the marketing angle of “more channels” had the result of taking away the one advantage of GMRS: The ability to use an external antenna.

Very few consumers appreciated the advantage of an external antenna, and most of the “inferior” 15-channel radios soon departed the market in favor of the “improved” 22-channel models. On the shelf, the competing products were distinguished mostly by the meaningless “mileage” claims on the package. Understandably, most purchasers didn’t bother to get the $90 license for their $20 radio. The license wasn’t even required for channels 8-14, and they could be used with virtually impunity on channels 1-7, even though a license might technically be required there.  There was no real advantage in using channels 15-22 where the license was required.

Millions of these radios were sold, and most of them were probably put away when the owners realized that the mileage claim on the package was meaningless.

Family Communications Tool

I’ve never bothered getting a GMRS license, mostly because of the $90 fee. While it would occasionally be nice to have, it’s really not worth it. As an amateur radio operator, I can get the same results with amateur radio. But occasionally, having a GMRS capability would be helpful. For example, a GMRS radio would make it possible to communicate with the kids within a mile or so.

In general, it’s not necessary to have both antennas at a high location.  Remember, an FRS radio is like a flashlight.  It can’t be seen very far away by someone else standing on the ground.  But it can be seen if the other person is at a high location.  Therefore, to turn it into a reliable method of family communication, it’s only necessary to have one good antenna at home, or on a vehicle.  The other person can be using an inexpensive FRS radio with a built-in antenna, but there will still be acceptable range.

Potential for Emergency Communications

And in an emergency, it would be possible to communicate with neighbors with an FRS radio. Several years ago, someone proposed a “National SOS Radio Network” to educate owners of FRS radios as to their possibilities for emergency communications, but the group’s website is now defunct and there appears to be no more effort to publicize the idea. It was a very good idea, although very limited in scope: After a disaster which wiped out other forms of communications, people would have the capability to talk to their neighbors, as long as they knew other people would be listening on the same emergency channel.

The DC Emergency Radio Network was a similar plan, but it also appears to be defunct.

Again, it’s not necessary for both sides of the transmission to have a good antenna.  But if one person in the neighborhood has a good antenna, then the other neighbors will be able to communicate with that person in an emergency, even with “toy” radios.  And if that person is capable of worldwide communication without commercial power (as I am), then the whole neighborhood is suddenly linked to the outside world.

It should be noted that an FRS radio would be a poor first choice for summoning help in an emergency.  It’s unlikely that anyone would be monitoring at any given time, and when I get my GMRS license, I have no plans to continuously monitor for potential emergencies.

But after a widespread emergency, such as a blizzard or earthquake, normal telephone service or even cell phone service might be unavailable.  After such an emergency, neighbors might have a need to communicate.  This wouldn’t necessarily be to summon assistance.  It might just be a matter of wanting to check on other neighbors.

If one neighbor has a GMRS station and can plan to monitor after other communications facilities are unavailable, this would provide a link to nearby neighbors with nothing more than a “toy” FRS radio.  If they know to turn it on in case of an emergency, and to what channel, then it seems to me that this could fill an important need after a disaster.

Getting a GMRS License and a Radio

Since I wanted to avoid the $90 fee, I’ve considered mounting an FRS radio in a weatherproof container outside, with the microphone, speaker, and power supply mounted inside. This could be used legally without the $90 license, and would function about as well as a licensed GMRS station.

With the fee reduced, it’s now more reasible to simply get a GMRS radio and the license.

Unfortunately, the very common and inexpensive 22-channel radios are useless for my intended purpose, since they don’t allow an external antenna. Fortunately, there are a few of the 15-channel radios available, and they do allow an external antenna connection.

One possibility, of course, is one of the many cheap Chinese handheld radios that are available. For example, my Baofeng UV-5R is capable of transmitting on the GMRS frequencies. Unfortunately, however, this is not a legal option. GMRS equipment needs to be specifically certified for GMRS use, and this radio is not. (In addition, the wideband receiver of the Baofeng desenses quite badly with an external antenna, and probably wouldn’t perform very well on receive.)

One of the Wouxun Chinese handheld radios appears to have received FCC certification for GMRS use, but I’ve been unable to find this model for sale.

One possibility would be a professional-grade transceiver such as the Icom IC-F21 GM, but that would entail more expense than I wanted. Cobra also makes a combination GMRS-Marine radio. This is somewhat out of my price range, but it could be a good choice for someone looking for a marine radio.

Fortunately, there are apparently a few manufacturers who didn’t get the memo about the marketing advantages of 22 channels, so there are a handful of the 15-channel GMRS transceivers available. At one time, the best bet was the Audiovox GMRS1535. This is a consumer-grade “blister pack” radio and sold at “blister pack” prices.

According to a couple of reports, the antenna appears to be removable with an SMA connector. If this is the case, then this radio can be used with an external antenna.  However, many of these radios do not have a detachable antenna.  The one I ordered had a permanent antenna.  Therefore, it appears that Audiovox made two versions of the same model.  Unless you can look at the radio you are buying, you can’t assume that the Audiovox has the option for an external antenna.

Currently, the best available option for a GMRS radio with external antenna appears to be the Midland MXT105.    This is a 5-watt radio.  It includes an external magnetic mount antenna with a cable of about 20 feet.  For most users, this antenna could be mounted on a metallic surface and give good results.  For better results, a more permanent antenna can be used.

This radio runs off 12 volts.  For many emergency applications, powering it with a battery would be the best option.  Another alternative would be a power supply such as this one.

This radio will be able to communicate with FRS radios.  Since it has an external antenna, you should get good results, even in connection with inexpensive FRS radios.  You can buy the MXT105 at Amazon or WalMart.  Many WalMart stores will have the radio in stock, but to make sure, you can order online at this link, and then pick the radio up at the store the same day.

Another possibility is the Blackbird RR5000, a 15-channel GMRS transceiver that appears to have provision for an external antenna.

Most of my readers have the technical wherewithal to set up a GMRS radio, and you should consider taking this step in order to serve your community in case of emergency.  If you’re a ham, you’ll probably recall that the Amateur’s Code says that your “station and skills are always ready for service to country and community.”  It seems to me that with a very small investment, you could be prepared to do just that.

For more information on the basics of emergency communications, please visit my emergency communications page, which is also available as a  Kindle book.



Another 1950 Boys’ Life One Tube Receiver

1950JanBLreceiver

A few months ago, I posted about a one-tube regenerative receiver from the September 1950 issue of Boys’ Life magazine. I was even sent some photos of a very similar receiver discovered by Jon, WS1K. That receiver covered short wave, I’m guessing about 3-6 MHz.

1950JanBLschematicInterestingly, I overlooked this one-tube receiver appearing in the same magazine a few months earlier. In the January 1950 issue of Boys’ Life appeared this one-tube receiver. The article was written by one of the same authors as the September article, Glenn A. Wagner. The January receiver appears to cover the broadcast band, since it calls for a “standard replacement antenna coil” along with a 365 uF variable capacitor. It uses a single 1N5G tube with a 1.5 volt battery for the filament, along with a 45-90 volt B battery. It’s all mounted on a 5×7 pine board.

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon



1926 Boys’ Life Crystal Set

1926BLxtalset

The January 1926 issue of Boys’ Life magazine contains the plans for this simple crystal set. According to the article, the parts would set the Scout back about 80 cents, not counting the headphones, which would cost about $3.00. The parts could be found at “any well-stocked five and ten cent store,” and the receiver was said to pull in stations up to twenty miles.

For those wishing to duplicate this or similar receivers, if your five and ten cent store isn’t sufficiently well stocked, you can get some ideas on locating the parts on my crystal set parts page.

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon



DX’ing From Outer Space

PopElecApr77

 

Quick Links

 

For about the past century, the planet Earth has been sending out into the cosmos radio signals, and it’s not uncommon to wonder whether anyone has heard them. The subject sometimes comes up in science fiction. For example, in the 1997 movie Contact, the first message received from an extraterrestrial source was, of all things, a speech by Hitler (conveniently complete with both audio and video). It was reasoned in the movie that this was one of the first television broadcasts from Earth, and as soon as the TV DX’ers in some other part of the galaxy received it, they sent it back. Presumably, I Love Lucy and other programs would follow within a couple of decades.

For the reasons explained below, this is relatively implausible. While it would be a relatively easy matter for another civilization to detect the presence of our signals, actually demodulating them (not to mention sending them back) would be considerably trickier. But it’s not totally impossible.


DX’ing From The Moon

But there’s another related question lurking here, and that is how difficult it would be for me to receive radio signals from Earth if I decided to visit the moon or some other place in space. Obviously, radio communications is possible at very great distances, since NASA does this on a daily basis. The question is what those of us with more modest equipment would be able to do.

The question is answered by an April 1977 Popular Electronics article written by Glenn Hauser.

Hauser’s focus in this article is primarily on the moon, and he convincingly shows that reception of FM and TV signals would be relatively easy to accomplish with reasonably good receivers and antennas. When the subject comes up, naysayers frequently point out that very few terrestrial stations use antennas that radiate very much energy “straight up.” It turns out, though, that this is actually the reason why many signals could be heard on the moon. After all, the moon is rarely “straight up.” It can be at many points in the sky, and at some of these points, it’s within the main lobe of broadcast stations on Earth.

Most FM and TV stations use what we think of as “omnidirectional” antennas: In other words, antennas that radiate equally strong signals in a full 360 degrees. But most of these antennas have a certain amount of gain: The effective radiated power of the signal is greater than the transmitter’s output power. This is because the “omnidirectional” pattern of the antenna is not omnidirectional at all. Instead, most of the power is concentrated into a single plane. It’s “omnidirectional” in the sense that it’s headed off toward the horizon in all directions. But it’s directional when you think of it in three dimensions. All of the energy is concentrated toward the horizon. This makes sense for the broadcaster, since all of their listeners are located on an (approximate) plane, bounded by the horizon.

This means that a station’s signal is being beamed toward the moon at two times per day: At local moonrise and local moonset. From the point of view of the listener on the moon, this means all of the stations along the Earth’s approaching and receding limbs, a narrow band circling the Earth. A station located at the North or South Pole would have its antenna pointing at the moon on a constant basis. Every other station on Earth would have its antenna pointed at the moon approximately every twelve hours.

There would still be a slight problem, however, since even on this narrow band, there would be multiple stations on any given frequency. I suspect that on some popular frequencies, this problem would be insurmountable, since the QRM would be just too great.

But there would be some signals that would be quite easy to copy, since they have the frequency to themselves, or share it only with much lower powered stations. Two examples given in the 1977 article is no longer relevant, but they’re good illustrations. Prior to the switch to digital television in the United States, TV channel 68 was occupied by only one station, KVST-TV in Los Angeles, with an ERP of a million watts. And on channel 67, WMPB, the Baltimore PBS channel, was in a similar position. These channels would be relatively easy to monitor from the moon whenever it was moonrise or moonset in Los Angeles or Baltimore. Hauser notes other such examples in Europe and Brazil.

Most of the FM band would be more cacophonous, but there would be some stations operating on relatively clear channels. Due to the FM capture effect, some of these would be relatively easy to hear, even if there was a bit of other activity on the same channel. For example, he cites a number of cases in the educational portion of the FM band (88-92 MHz), where there’s a single high-power station in the United States, with other stations on that channel having much lower power. In those cases, the dominant signal would be easily heard. He also cites a number of high powered Canadian stations operating on channels where only low powered stations existed in the United States. Since the FM situation has been relatively static since 1977, most of these stations would remain fairly easy catches from the moon.

Hauser does point out that longwave and mediumwave (standard AM broadcasts) would be unlikely to penetrate the ionosphere.  Only signals above the maximum usable frequency (MUF) could be heard outside the confines of the Earth.  Therefore, he notes that it’s unlikely that we had much radio leakage to speak of prior to about the 1930’s, when relatively strong shortwave stations started coming on the air.  Since most of these stations operated on regular schedules, it’s likely that they were still radiating, even when the MUF dipped below their transmitter frequency.  Those signals would radiate into space.  Hauser cites one example of a BBC transmission from the VOA station in Delano, California, being copied by a satellite.


DX’ing by Extraterrestrial Civilizations

The issue raised by the movie Contact is touched on by Hauser, but it’s studied in scholarly detail by a NASA report entitled Eavesdropping Mode and Radio Leakage from Earth by Woodrull T. Sullivan III.  While this report doesn’t show a date, it appears to be written post-1978.  It answers the question of what extraterrestrial listeners, with equipment comparable to that available on Earth, would be able to hear.  It turns out that those extraterrestrial viewers would be able to determine quite a bit, although it’s unlikely that they would be able to demodulate the video of speeches by Hitler.

Even though they might not be able to watch our shows, extraterrestrial monitors within several light years of the Earth would be able to make quite a few reasonable deductions about the Earth, even if they were equipped with only Earth-level receivers and antennas.  At least they would have been able to.  It turns out that the best source of information would be the video carriers of UHF television stations.  With the switch to digital television, some of those extraterrestrials might have concluded that the Earth has gone dark.

But those UHF carriers from a few years ago are still working their way through space, and it’s possible that someone is analyzing them.  The article makes clear that the modulation of those signals (the actual audio or video) would be too weak to decode with Earth-level technology.  But the presence of the carriers would be apparent.  And even with this information, extraterrestrials would be able to come to some intelligent conclusions.  They would be able to figure out which star the signals were coming from.  And by keeping close track, they would be able to figure out the diameter of the Earth’s orbit around the sun.

They would even be able to figure out the approximate latitudes and longitudes of individual stations.  This is because the signals would come and go on a regular schedule as the Earth made its 24-hour rotation.  As noted above, stations near the poles would be audible most of the time.  As stations got closer and closer to the equator, they would be audible for shorter periods each twelve hours.  The Doppler shift of received signals would give further clues as to the latitude of the signals being heard.  Eventually, the extraterrestrials would be able to crunch the numbers and figure out the approximate terrestrial locations of the stations.  If the correctly assumed that the locations of these signals were close to the locations of greatest human population, they would even be able to roughly map out the population distribution of the Earth.

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon



1940 Postcard Radio

PostcardRadio1Seventy-five years ago, the May 1940 issue of Popular Science carried the plans for this novelty crystal set that was suitable for mailing as a letter. You could slip it into an envelope “and mail to one of your radio-minded friends as an amusing birthday or holiday greeting.”

The radio was sandwiched inside two postcards, with the detector and taps for the tuning coil exposed. Connections for antenna, ground, and headphones were made to paper fasteners which also held the “chassis” together.

To keep it flat, the coil was wound “spider web” style, with four taps for tuning. Blobs of solder were left exposed, and a “crocodile clip” was used to make the connections.

The whole radio could be mailed for six cents.  The schematic is shown below:

PostcardRadio2

All of the parts for this set should be easily obtainable. If you need help finding any (the most difficult to find would be the high-impedance earphone), I have sources on my crystal set parts page.

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon



Science Fair Idea: Measuring the Speed of Sound

Measuring the speed of sound with an oscilloscope.

Measuring the speed of sound with an oscilloscope.

In an earlier post, I gave some ideas for young mad scientists to employ for science fair projects. Another idea comes from the pages of the April 1966 issue of Radio Constructor, a British electronics magazine. The article explains two methods of experimentally measuring the speed of sound. One of those methods requires an oscilloscope, but the other one requires only an AC voltmeter.

Measuring the speed of sound with an AC voltmeter.

Measuring the speed of sound with an AC voltmeter.

Fortunately, the young experimenter of today can duplicate either of these experiments quite easily. For the version of the experiment requiring an AC voltmeter, most modern digital multitesters would be very suitable, and they are often available for next to nothing. The following examples are currently available at Amazon:


Harbor Freight
often has multitesters on sale, or occasionally for free. They’re also available inexpensively at WalMart.

The oscilloscope is more expensive, but still a lot less expensive than 1966. For example, this USB Oscilloscope can be used with a PC for a reasonable price. And while a bit more do-it-yourself work would be required, this USB oscilloscope is also very inexpensive.

The only other equipment required is an audio signal generator (for which you could easily use your computer’s sound card) and an audio amplifier, such as this one. The other required parts, such as speakers, can easily be scrounged up.

Using either method, it’s fairly simple to measure the wavelength of the audio signal. Since the frequency is known, it’s then an easy matter to calculate the speed of sound, which would be frequency times wavelength. The possibilities for using this as part of a science fair project are unlimited. For example, it would be possible to measure the speed of sound under various conditions, such as with differing barometric pressures or altitudes. By waterproofing the speakers, it would be possible to measure speed of sound in water, and compare it to the value in the air.

In any event, your poor teacher is probably tired of seeing paper mache volcanoes, and will probably be quite impressed at your abilities.

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon



1967 One Tube Receiver

1967OneTube

In 1967, the publishers of Electronics Illustrated and Mechanix Illustrated presented this little one-tube receiver in a publication entitled Practical Electronics.

1967OneTubeSchematicThe receiver tuned the AM broadcast band, amateur bands, or shortwave broadcast with the use of plug-in coils wound on the bases of old octal tubes. It used a dual-triode 12AT7 tube. One half served as the regenerative detector, with the other half serving as an audio amplifier. It used an isolation transformer, making the set relatively safe to use with 120 volts.

It was set up mostly as a low-cost starter receiver for the ham, as most of the coil data was for the ham bands. However, it would also make a good SWL receiver, and coil data was given for the 31 meter broadcast band.

Click Here For Today’s Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Cartoon



75 Years of HCJB Shortwave

HCJB grounds.  Wikipedia photo. by Mschaa - Own work. Licensed under GFDL via Wikimedia Commons

HCJB grounds. Wikipedia photo. by Mschaa – Own work. Licensed under GFDL via Wikimedia Commons.

In the early 1940’s, the physics department of the University of Chicago was undoubtedly an exciting place. In late 1942, the world’s first self-sustaining nuclear reaction took place under the stands of the football stadium under the direction of Columbia Unviersity Professor Enrico Fermi.

On Easter Sunday 1940, the atomic pile had not yet been built, but the University was clearly about to be at the center of some of the greatest science of our time.  But one graduate student was about to hear a different call, and it came over the shortwave radio.

On Easter Sunday, 1940, a new radio station had just come on the air and was conducting its inaugural broadcast with a new 10 KW shortwave transmitter.  The station wasn’t entirely new, but it had just installed the new transmitter, and it now had a strong signal to North America.  That station was HCJB, the Voice of the Andes, in Quito, Ecuador.

The station had been founded in 1931 by American missionary Clarence W. Jones.  Jones had worked under Chicago evangelist Paul Rader, who had been one of the first radio evangelists, having a weekly program called “WJBT” (Where Jesus Blesses Thousands), which was carried by WBBM in Chicago.  Jones had been impressed by the radio’s ability to spread the Gospel, and felt called to establish a radio ministry in Latin America.  In 1928, he traveled to Venezuela, Colombia, Panama and Cuba, seeking a location for the station, but was unable to receive government permits in any of those countries.

Later, Christian and Missionary Alliance missionaries to Ecuador encouraged him to start the radio station there.  In 1930, Jones obtained the approval of the Ecuadorian government to begin a station,

HCJB came on the air on Christmas Day, 1931.  The initial 30-minute broadcast in English and Spanish was from a fairly respectable 200 watt transmitter.  But that transmitter was sitting on a table in Jones’ living room, with a simple wire antenna strung between two poles.  And there were only six receivers in the country at the time.

Notwithstanding its small start, the station continued to grow.  And by 1940, it was able to install the substantial 10 KW shortwave transmitter that would provide good coverage in both South and North America.  By 1941, broadcasts were expanded to include Russian, Swedish and Quichua.  Other languages soon followed.

The inauguration of the new shortwave transmitter was noted in North America.  The shortwave bands reflected the fact that Europe was now at war, and the message of peace transmitted from Ecuador was a breath of fresh air.  The shortwave editor of Radio Guide magazine made these observations in the April 20, 1940, issue:

            “The Voice of the Andes”

To those listeners tired of the eternal babble of Europe’s shortwave voices of hate and war: Turn your dials to HCJB (12.48), “The Voice of the Andes,” at Quito, Ecuador. Here, at an elevation of 10,000 feet, encircled by eleven snow-capped peaks of the mighty Andes, nestles the oldest city of the New World, one of the ancient capitals of the Incas steeped in fifteen hundred years of traditions; a city whose many white churches shelter staggering treasures in gold and precious stones; a city with winding cobbled streets, overhanging balconies, ancient archways, sunlit plazas and countless white-stone houses perched crazily on steep hillsides, their red-tile roofs, with green moss cropping out here and there in the cracks, forming vivid splotches of color against the snowy mantle of the guardian peaks.

Such a historic and picturesque setting seems indeed a fitting site for a missionary radio station whose messages are those of peace and good-will. This new 10,000-watt modern short-wave transmitter–the most powerful in South America and the only broadcast station to employ a fully rotatable antenna–stands as a tribute to the sacrificing labors of one many–Clarence Jones, a gospel missionary from Chicago, whose lifework is to minister to and teach the Andean Indians. Because of the rugged contours of Ecuador, making transportation exceedingly difficult, Reverend Jones recognized long ago the vital value of radio in carrying on his work and subsequently installed several small short-wave stations at Quito, including the former 1,000-watt transmitter of HCJB and a mobile broadcasting station which carries this active pastor’s voice to the most remote jungle and mountain tribes. The new station–a labor of love paid for by voluntary subscriptions from his loyal friends–was built by an American amateur, Clarence Moore, who is well known to hundreds of amateur friends under his call, HC1JB. The new “Voice of the Andes” was officially inaugurated on Sunday, March 24.

On the dial, HCJB (12.46) comes in above the 25-meter band and approximately half-way between the 12 and 13 megacycles figures in frequency. You will have no trouble in hearing HCJB, since its unique location and rotatable aerial make it possible for it to project strong signals into North America.

HCJB is on the air for several hours daily with Spanish programs for the benefit of listeners in the Latin Americas, but English listeners will be primarily interested in “Ecuadorian Echoes,” on from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m., and the “Friendship Hour,” broadcast nightly except Mondays from 9:00 to 10:00 p.m. EST. These all-English programs are directed specifically to North America. “Ecuadorean Echoes,” one of the most interesting programs on the air, breathes the very soul of Latin America. During this period the native music, the literature and the very lives and habits of these romantic peoples come to life and parade before the microphone. “The Friendship Hour” is a strictly good-will program consisting of classical music, old-time hymns, simple gosple messages, the reading of letters from listeners and personal messages to friends everywhere.

Among the listeners to that first program on Easter Sunday 75 years ago was University of Chicago graduate student Clayton Howard. He had received his undergraduate degree in physics the previous year from nearby Wheaton College.  He had been born in China to missionary parents who returned to the United States when Clayton was 9, in order for Clayton’s father, Charles Howard, to organize the biology department at Wheaton.

By this time, Clayton was a licensed amateur radio operator.  In the 1938 call book, he is listed as holding call sign W9KJZ.  For whatever reason, he happened to be tuning above the 25 meter band that night and heard the new station.  He later recounted that he was aware of a missionary station in South America, but knew little about it before chancing upon its broadcast that night.  He was intrigued enough to seek out Reuben Larson, one of the missionaries to Ecuador who had a decade earlier encouraged Jones to start the station.

HCJB technical staff in 1945.  Head engineer Clayton Howard is in the center.   (Image by by SkagitRiverQueen, Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikipedia.)

HCJB technical staff in 1945. Head engineer Clayton Howard is in the center. (Image by by SkagitRiverQueen, Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikipedia.)

The name Clayton Howard is familiar to many hams and shortwave listeners.  1941 saw Howard be commissioned by his church as a missionary and accept a call to serve on the technical staff of HCJB.  Howard went on to become the station’s chief engineer, and is best known as being the on-air host of the “DX Partyline” program, which he produced and hosted for 22 years.  This program was very popular with SWL’s, as it included station reports and other listening tips.  The program always concluded with Howard offering a short segment entitled, “Tips for Real Living,” in which he shared with listeners a brief Gospel devotional message.

Clayton Howard and wife Helen hosting DX Party Line, 1970's.  Photo courtesy HCJB, used with permission.

Clayton Howard and wife Helen hosting DX Party Line, 1970’s. HCJB photo.

The Soviets didn’t normally provide recognition to Christian missionaries, but in Howard’s case, they made an exception.  When Howard retired in 1984 and made his last DX Partyline broadcast, Radio Moscow announced that “the living legend of the Andes has retired.”

If you grew up as I did listening to a shortwave radio in the 1960’s and 1970’s, the name Clayton Howard is certainly a familiar one.  And chances are, you heard one of those tips for real living.  If you did, it was probably because on Easter Sunday, 1940, a 12.48 megacycle radio signal traveled from the Andes to a receiver in Chicago.

As a result of that Radio Signal, Clayton Howard probably never met Enrico Fermi.  He probably had nothing to do with the construction of the atomic pile under the football stadium.  If he had, perhaps Howard would be remembered today as a nuclear physicist.  But God called him elsewhere, and it appears that He made that call on 12.48 megacycles.

References

Read More at Amazon